Posted in General Science on Nov 23, 2010
Yesterday I flew to San Francisco from New York’s JFK Airport  (Terminal 8). As I was going through the TSA security checkpoint, I noticed that even though OSI’s Rapiscan Secure 1000 body scanners were in place, they were not used to screen the passengers. Relieved, I happily went through a regular metal detector.
Upon arrival at SFO, I glanced at the security checkpoint and I saw a different type of body scanner – L3’s ProVision.  So it seems we have two competing advanced imaging technologies: OSI’s  backscatter X-Ray or so-called the Compton Scattering Effect and L3’s “active millimeter wave radio frequency” (MMW). Here is what each manufacture says about their product’s technology and safety:
OSI:
The Rapiscan Secure 1000’s patented technology is composed of an ultra low-dose X-ray source that images backscattered X-rays through to a remote operator’s workstation.
Emission Per Scan: Less than 10 microRem
L3:
Leveraging harmless radio waves, ProVision offers advanced imaging—without any health risks.
• The signals created by ProVision are 10,000 times lower than other commercial radio frequency devices.
• ProVision does not use X-rays or ionizing radiation.
Ok, it appears that OSI’s technology is patented and a quick search for all the US Patents assigned to “Rapiscan Systems, Inc” reveals 43 search results ( I used advanced “AN/Rapiscan” query in UPSTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database).
The very first patent 6,094,472 titled – “X-ray backscatter imaging system including moving body tracking assembly” was filed with the USPTO on 04/14/1998 by the inventor Dr. Steven W. Smith (Poway, CA).
As you can see from the  drawing above, it doesn’t quite look like a Rapiscan Secure 1000 system, however, the patent does provide some clues to a radiation exposure level:
“at least one X-ray source comprises an X-ray tube operating at a potential of 70 KV at 10 ma.”
“Radiation exposure is an important consideration in X-ray concealed object detection systems. The United States National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP), in NCRP Report No. 91, “Recommendations on Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation”, 1987, addresses this issue. In this report, the NCRP states that a radiation exposure of less than 1000 microRem per year in excess of environmental levels is negligible, and efforts are not warranted at reducing the level further. Persons employed in high security or secured facilities, or those who frequently travel by airlines, may be subjected to many hundred security examinations per year. A yearly radiation exposure limit of 1000 microRem permits a single scan exposure within the range of 1 to 10 microRem for the general public. In accordance with the NCRP recommendations, radiation levels significantly higher than this present a non-trivial health risk.”
“the scan duration for a complete scan is on the order of 0.3 seconds”
Alright, it looks like I can go through Rapiscan Secure about 100 times per year and I should be ok, right? But then I found this recent article published in “Radiation Protection Dosimetry” where Rez et el. [1] examine radiation exposure of Compton backscatter X-rays. The researches caution:
“Although vendor-determined doses are small and not associated with adverse health effects, dose accuracy is in question because of inherent difficulties in measuring X-ray exposures from rapidly moving X-ray beams.”
Hmm, it is getting interesting, I will continue dig dipper.
References:
[1] P. Rez, R.L. Metzger and K.L. Mossman, “THE DOSE FROM COMPTON BACKSCATTER SCREENING”, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, Nov. 2010.
diltiazem 2 cream
efectos adversos ezetimibe
augmentin reaction
diclofenac medication
ddavp and gi bleed
coming off citalopram 10mg after 2 weeks
cozaar black box warning
depakote side effects bipolar
hd porna ggjinnysflogg.CAW16Qxi80F
sex video 4 k ggjennifegg.Ctc5fXIOVye
hd sex videos download gghkyogg.dFR5dxYae9M
cozaar 25 mg price
citalopram interactions with alcohol
depakote blood levels
how long does escitalopram take to work
is gabapentin
does amoxicillin affect birth control pills
why drink water with bactrim ds
can you drink alcohol on cephalexin
e4r0qf
can bactrim treat bv
ciprofloxacin foods to avoid
cephalexin keflex
escitalopram 10mg para que sirve
does gabapentin help you sleep
can amoxicillin cure std
can you take cephalexin and amoxicillin together
zithromax price
diamox vs lasix
glucophage eureka
gabapentin vs lyrica
escort tthighereduhryyy.LV2QcY1Gm9v
flagyl otc
difference between lasix and furosemide
zoloft review
escort siteleri vvsetohimalxxvc.Dwxuw8GHDinw
lisinopril-hctz 20-12.5 mg
porno eyeconartxx.YshxwYGdCz8A
sexx 250tldenemebonusuxx.LgqDwSrcu42c
am siteleri bingoxx.VLYxvNoDZsfs
fuck mobileidn.zPNTZytQruve
eskort siteleri pokkerx.iy2H11iaTaOb
Insightful piece
pornhub bahis siteleri 0qbxjluaxcxjsxzz.r6IZESwz9Vbw
porno izle bxjluajsxzz.9BrYeGrnJ5UP
fuck google bjluajszz.XHWRL10kXjxw
anal siteleri juljulfbi.Mt7cZunh0yYd
watch porn video hepxhupx.vEZUTEpr771A
bahis siteleri sikis hephupx.0CNJZYAGzbl4
eski rahatiniz olmayacak asillartaklitler.6EnPaph1NzFd
pornhub bahis siteleri pompadirha.j8E6iG37nTS6
seks siteleri wrtgdfgdfgdqq.L5vjEcDYI7H5
escort wrtgdfgdfgdqq.oYkha9mw5LhP
anal sikis siteleri wrtgdfgdfgdqq.EuTlMUcEEyY6
viagra ewrjghsdfaa.TiSKvSpMnnqW
porno siteleri hyuqgzhqt.hBwHQ7yJv1Zu
porn citixx.i9l6PpDubJLt
tadalafil (megalis-macleods) 10 mg
pornhub bahis siteleri yaralandinmieycan.5rOpGmNdE9TM
house porn vurgunyedim.9OkYoXhNbaB6
prismatically xyandanxvurulmus.XJh3sDrZDVMN
nourishments xyandanxvurulmus.tjgJUWERAAgC
xbunedirloooo.RZ8HNb760ZOV
yandanxvurulmus.tN9dQTAAtqHG
daxktilogibigibi.2WxNzeM9fkCX
daktilogibigibi.a23GVsleQYbi
vurucuteamgeldi.z3szbHk67UUZ
vurcazkircazpatliycaz.nPGZB0pvUUvm
Depo 25 Bonus 25
blog topic
The US government also tells us an abundance of vaccines, fluoridated water, genetically modified food, and the like are safe. They are NOT. I don’t trust what the government says and always do my own research.
[…] why is it okay for Federal employees to lie to the […]
[…] the TSA has implemented new search procedures. Of these methods, the AIT machines (which come intwo flavors) and the enhanced pat down have been causing a great deal […]
[…] the TSA has implemented new search procedures. Of these methods, the AIT machines (which come in two flavors) and the enhanced pat down, have been causing a great deal of controversy. November 24, 2010 […]
Only 100 times? The TSA claims you can go thousands of times thru without any harm.